‘TFL
issue will have no impact on Tata brand’
Economic Times August 22, 2002
New Delhi: The
Tatas haven’t done anything ethically wrong in
Tata Finance Ltd, and the current crisis will
not have a major impact on the Tata brand, said
Tata Sons executive director R Gopalakrishnan.
He added that competitors may have a role in the
vilification campaign in the Tata Finance issue,
but said that he couldn’t say whether it was some
sort of corporate war.
Giving
examples of other brands that have come through
crisis, Mr Gopalakrishnan said, "Every
time a brand gets into controversy, it looks finished,
but that is not so."
Speaking
broadly about the Tata brand, which is worth Rs
10,000 crore at present, he said it is seen as
"reliable, trustworthy" brand with a
profile of a reassuring middle-aged person. He
added that the organisation is going through major
changes. The average layers of hierarchy in a
Tata company have come down from around nine to
three or five over the last few years. The group
was now streamlining the organisation by often
not filling the posts vacated through retirement,
bringing in different kinds of executive separation
schemes and taking a sharper look at non-performance.
Detailing
the company’s changing HR profile, Mr Gopalakrishnan
said that while 10 years back, the company had
3.2 lakh employees, of which around 22,000 were
executives, now the group had around 2.3 lakh
employees, of which around 38,000 were executives.
Speaking
on the group’s future investment plans, Mr Gopalakrishnan
said that the group’s money was mostly going into
information technology and telecom sectors. He
added that the company was looking at the branding
aspect of its wireless in local loop (WiLL) service.
The
company was mostly follows a three-tiered branding
strategy, where the group’s name came first, followed
by the generic product name, and then the specific
name given to that product sub-category. The exceptions
to this trend were brands like Tata Salt, Titan
and Trent.
He
also added that Tata Chemicals was examining the
issue of entering branded food segment, though
at this stage there was no concrete move.

|
|