|
current
status | rescue package |
industry expectations |
the FM's mind | budget
blues |
report card | key
ratios
The current imperative is to
boost the growth rate to at least seven per cent plus,
which is both employment-oriented as well as non-inflationary.
We list certain factors which could rescue the economy,
if the FM takes them into consideration in his budget:
Revive savings: Savings rate as percentage of
GDP has undergone a decline from 25.5 per cent in 1995-96
to 22.3 per cent in 1998-99. This can be attributed
to factors like: (i) withdrawal of several tax exemptions
and concessions (80L, 56EA, 56EB, etc) in the various
budgets, thus pruning avenues for savings especially
for the household sector; (ii) declining returns on
savings due to falling interest rates; (iii) rising
tax burden on the corporate sector; (iv) sustained dis-saving
by the public sector; (iv) uncertain performance of
capital markets and mutual funds.
The potential for savings is
strong, thanks to the on-going VRS schemes being implemented
by the private and public sectors. The forthcoming budget
can take initiatives to create additional saving avenues
by reintroducing some of the tax saving schemes that
were abolished earlier. Secondly, it is high time the
government takes note of the rapid dis-savings on its
part and brings out firm measures to curtail its ever
burgeoning expenditure. In addition, PSUs should also
restructure their finances by targetting assets sweating
and/or improving their turnover.
Enlightenment on generation
II reforms: There is a widespread fear about privatisation
and WTO challenges, which primarily stems from lack
of awareness about these issues. This, in turn, is blocking
the progress of second generation reforms and, in the
bargain, stalling the emergence of a competitive environment.
There is, therefore, a dire need to create adequate
awareness on the actual impact of these initiatives.
In this context, the significance of a tripartite understanding
between the government, industry and trade unions is
highly imperative. It is high time the FM takes appropriate
steps to set this process in motion. Transformation
of the old mindset in favour of a liberal economic model
-- which has been adopted even by a socialist country
like China -- is a must.
Steps for fiscal correction:
While the fiscal deficit target of 5.1 per cent is not
likely to be achieved this year, a positive development
on the fiscal front is the recent tabling of the Fiscal
Responsibility and Budget Management Bill in Parliament.
Among other objectives, the bill aims at eliminating
the revenue deficit and bringing down the fiscal deficit
to 2 per cent of GDP by March 2006.
Admittedly, the above objective
is highly laudable, but it would be self-effacing if
achieved at the objective of curtailing much needed
capital expenditure. It is about time that the FM takes
appropriate measures to correct the budgetary arithmetic
-- bringing down the rising revenue deficit and hiking
the stagnant capital expenditure.
Channelising investments into
growth sectors: For sustained growth, investments
in physical and social infrastructure are an important
prerequisite, and the primary initiative has to come
from the government. Although the government has tried
to attract private investment, the response so far has
been lukewarm in the face of uncertain policies, long
gestation period and low returns.
A long-term growth perspective
requires that the budget give a clear direction on pruning
of government expenditure and diversion of the same
to growth enhancing physical and social infrastructure.
Undoubtedly, this is a long-term initiative, but the
budget can surely make a beginning.
Understanding and promoting
the needs of industry: As part of the pre-budgetary
exercise, the industrial sector has submitted its charter
of demands. However, transparent and clear-cut policies
in the budget would go a long way in promoting the interests
of industry.
This pivotal sector has often
faced the brunt of arbitrary governmental policies.
For instance, under the garb of huge rehabilitation
costs due to the earthquake, the government has promptly
imposed a two per cent levy on IT and corporate tax,
which is expected to yield a paltry Rs.1,300 crore.
This comes over and above the 10 per cent surcharge
imposed in the previous budget and the recent 1 per
cent levy on the corporate sector for the Contingency
Relief Fund proposed to be set up in the 11th Finance
Plan.
Effective rates of taxation for
individuals and corporations stand at 35.1 per cent
and 39.6 per cent respectively. As a result, taxation
has reached the same level it was four years back. As
if this was not enough, the PM, who expects the economy
to grow at the sustained rate of nine per cent, has
warned of a further rise in taxes in the forthcoming
budget!
Given the gathering momentum
of industrial slowdown, the levy lacks justification.
This is all the more glaring when the corporate sector
is already contributing to 80 per cent of the total
tax revenue. Apparently, the government has not taken
into account other alternate avenues like borrowing
from the international agencies at concessional rates,
raising funds through tax-free Earthquake Relief Bonds
and widening the service tax net.
Incidentally, service tax accounts
for a paltry 1.5 per cent of total tax revenue although
the booming service sector contributes 45 per cent to
the GDP. Besides, the government also appears to have
ignored tax defaulters, who collectively owe the exchequer
a stupendous Rs.62,000 crore. Even if a fraction of
this sum was garnered for earthquake relief, the fresh
levy could have been avoided.
Employment generation:
The post liberalisation era has probably resulted in
worsening the unemployment problem on account of: (i)
industrial restructuring (including VRS),
(ii) unequal growth in opportunities, i.e. predominant
generation of jobs in the new economy sector but the
exclusion of agriculture and the unorganised sector.
In this context, the FM can take
measures to ensure employment generation via infrastructure
promotion as also set in motion the long-term objective
of agricultural reforms and diversification to create
greater employment opportunities in the non-formal sectors.
current
status | rescue package |
industry expectations |
the FM's mind | budget
blues |
report card | key
ratios
|