Tata
Chemicals' dividend declared, PAT up 40%
June
1, 2001
The
company PAT at Rs. 164 crore is 40% higher than
the previous year. The profit for the year before
tax and extraordinary items of Rs. 276 crore was
slightly higher than the corresponding figure
for the previous year (Rs. 267 crore).
These
results have been achieved in spite of the negative
impacts of an earthquake, a fire and a reduction
in allocations for fertiliser sales. An increased
investment income during this year compared to
the previous year helped to overcome the above
negative impacts. Further, the directors considered
it appropriate to provide Rs. 77 crore as a contingency
for fertiliser revenues accounted in 1994-95 and
1995-96, which are higher than the provisional
price. The board recommended the same dividend
as the previous year i.e. Rs. 5/- per share.
With
respect to operations of the year, the market
share of the company in the soda ash market was
maintained at 42% and soda ash price realizations
sharply improved as the year progressed. Thus,
a declining soda ash turnover trend was reversed.
A record export of soda ash further helped a recovery.
A major cost erosion drive during the second half
resulted in significant cost savings. These continuing
measures should bear fruit in the years ahead.
One-time costs relating to reduced capital expenditure,
stock valuations and sales outstandings have also
been charged to the P&L account. With the
sale of detergents being finalised and the decision
to identify partners/buyers for the cement plant,
the Mithapur operation will be increasingly very
focused.
The
operations at Mithapur are quickly returning to
normalcy, and the soda ash plant is already operating
at a capacity of about 60%. The damaged power
turbines are expected to be brought back on line
progressively from this month onwards.
Along
with the rest of the fertiliser industry, the
Babrala operations continue to face an uncertain
fertiliser policy. However, the plant continued
to perform as the most energy efficient plant
in the country, but the profits were lower than
the previous year due to reduced ECA allocation.
For
results, click
here
|
|