|
Philip Chacko
The target is youth and the change agent
is the Centre for Civil Society, an unusual organisation
that is stretching every sinew to unshackle India from
the bureaucratic chains keeping it fettered
A railway porter's badge
can cost up to Rs 4 lakh in Delhi. More than 80 per
cent of the children who pass Standard V exams from
schools run by the municipal corporation of India's
capital cannot read or write their names. The 100-odd
employees of the Delhi Energy Development Agency have
no official work other than collecting their salaries.
Delhi is not a dry state, but it has a Directorate of
Prohibition with 34 staffers and a yearly budget of
Rs 1.6 crore. The Delhi Public Library is a shambolic
institution that, in 2001-02, received Rs 2.6 crore
in government grants and spent a mere 6.35 per cent
of this on acquiring new books.
These are some of the many nuggets
unearthed by the Centre for Civil Society (CCS), established
in 1997 by Parth J. Shah, who gave up a job teaching
economics at the University of Michigan, US, to pursue
his true passion, which is to exercise the realm of
ideas and the potential of youth to try and transform
an economic and political system that, he believes,
has kept India shackled. CCS describes itself as an
"independent, non-profit research and educational
organisation devoted to improving the quality of life
of all citizens of India by reviving and reinvigorating
civil society".
What exactly is civil society?
"This whole idea of civil society came about in
the late 1970s and the early 1980s, and it was articulated
largely by Eastern European intellectuals," explains
Mr Shah, the president of CCS. "The communist domination
they had suffered meant that, in their countries, government
had come to occupy almost every sphere of a citizen's
life; there was nothing one could do that was not touched
by government. They began to think about societal institutions
that could occupy the space between the spheres of family
and state, and these they defined as the associations
of civil society. Civil society is what makes a good
society."
Mr Shah says that the modern
advocates of the civil society concept were merely refining
what had been enunciated by people such as Alexis de
Tocqueville, the French political writer famous for
his analysis of US institutions, most notably in the
150-year-old classic, Democracy in America. "Civil
society was what made America robust enough to sustain
different points of view," says Mr Shah, whose
objective is to make CCS an instrument that "encourages
people to look beyond the obvious, think beyond good
intentions and act beyond activism".
Mr Shah's objective for the Centre
is clear. "We got our political independence in
1947 from the British state, but we still haven't secured
complete social, cultural and economic independence
from the Indian state," he says. "Many components
of our life are still controlled to a large extent by
the state. The construct driving CCS is, in a sense,
to push back the state to its legitimate domain; this
way you make more space for civil society."
The internship programme is one of the main planks in
the Centre's campaign to limit the role that government
plays in our everyday lives, and to champion the rule
of law, free trade and the individual rights of citizens.
The others are policy seminars and dialogues, advocacy
and publishing, and essay and documentary competitions.
CCS is headquartered in Delhi and much of its work is
based in the city, but it has increasingly been reaching
out to other parts of India, urban and semi-urban, mostly
with its seminars, which have travelled well to states
such as Gujarat, West Bengal and Kerala.
The internship programme, which
operates for a minimum period of one month and mostly
attracts fresh college graduates, helps researchers
gain experience in the real-life application of economic,
political, and social theories and principles, and it
hones their skills in analysis and writing (some of
their work with CCS has appeared as articles in newspapers).
The Centre provides a stipend whenever possible and
covers the actual expenses incurred as part of the programme.
It has, till date, supported 55 interns doing research
on various socio-economic issues.
Among the outstanding outcomes
of this programme is the publication, State of Governance:
Delhi Citizen Handbook 2003, a landmark and painstaking
compilation of the bureaucratic jungle that Delhi's
denizens have to battle against on a daily basis. The
goal of the handbook, which details 23 agencies, boards,
corporations and departments of the Delhi government
and the Municipal Corporation of Delhi, is to help the
capital's residents understand the way their babus function,
and it suggests methods that can improve the quality
and effectiveness of governance.
Some of the handbook's findings
are depressing, to put it mildly: the Prevention of
Food Adulteration Department has 28 inspectors overseeing
some 1.5 lakh 'registered' food establishments (at one
outlet per inspector per day, an establishment will
be inspected once in 17 years); the Delhi Transport
Corporation employs 12 people to a bus and incurs a
monthly loss of Rs 25 crore (private operators employ,
on an average, six people to a bus and make profits);
the Delhi Drug Control Department has 29 inspectors
to 'control' more than 5,000 pharmaceutical retailers
(the fake drug market here is estimated to generate
more than Rs 4,000 crore a year).
One more subject that has come
under the CCS scanner is licensing, not of the industrial
kind, which was abolished in the beginning of the 1990s,
but the regulations covering street vendors. Anybody
wanting, for instance, to sell vegetables in the colonies
in Delhi, needs a license, and very few of these precious
pieces of paper are given out by the Delhi Municipal
Corporation. "Most of the people who do this kind
of business are operating illegally," says Mr Shah.
"That leads to two things: one, they are always
open to harassment by the police and municipal officials,
and, two, they have to pay fixed bribes on a regular
basis. All that these people are trying to do is earn
an honest living. Instead of helping them, the state
has a system that subjugates them."
The sorry case of cycle-rickshaw
operators has also been researched by the Centre's scholars,
and this has opened another can of regulatory worms.
The trickle of licenses issued for these people has
resulted in a whole lot of them plying their trade illegally.
Mr Shah says CCS's research showed that traffic policemen
and officials squeeze a whopping Rs 6 crore in bribes
every month from these unfortunates. "We argued
against this inhuman structure and finally the Prime
Minister's Office issued guidelines to the Delhi government
to abolish the licensing system for street vendors and
cycle-rickshaw operators. Two months later, the decision
was reversed."
CSS's 'Liberty & Society
Seminars' (LSS) are a crucial element of its civil society
agenda. A four-day residential programme open to students
doing their graduation and post graduation, its format
includes lectures and discussions, working groups, documentary
videos and field trips. The objective is to provide
college students a greater understanding of the larger
world society, economy and culture within
the classical liberal framework that emphasises limited
government, rule of law, free trade and individual rights.
Open at a time to about 45 students, selected through
an application process, the seminar recently won the
Templeton Award for Student Outreach, instituted by
the Atlas Foundation, US. "To be bombarded with
so many new ideas in such a short period of time is
exasperating, yet, I feel I am a more enlightened person,
more liberalistic in my view than before," says
Ramu S., who attended this seminar in Kochi in 2003.
The Centre's 'Liberty, Art &
Culture Seminars' (LACS), which grew out of the LSS
experience, are focused on young media professionals
and those from the artistic community. Additionally,
the Centre conducts an 'economics in one lesson, law
and economics seminar' for students, teachers, professionals
and officers of the Indian Administrative Service. Taken
together, these seminars have, since they began in 1998,
attracted and informed more than 4,400 students and
others in 23 small and large cities across the country.
"Our best ambassadors are those who have come through
these seminars," says Manali Shah, a programme
coordinator with CCS. "In 2003 we had nine applications
from around the world, places like China and Finland,
and we accept one or two foreign interns every year."
The Centre's endeavours in publishing
have produced a bunch of impressive and well-received
titles that enrich and entrench the civil society hypothesis.
Jeevika, the documentary competition that CCS got started
in 2003, is designed as a forum where young filmmakers
can showcase works on legal and regulatory restrictions,
bureaucratic processes, social and cultural norms, and
religious practices that prevent or constrain people
from earning a straightforward living. Jeevika offers
winners cash prizes and financial support for subsequent
ventures on a related theme.
The youth tack that dominates
the Centre's discourses and initiatives is a deliberately
taken one. Mr Shah elucidates the Centre's focus on
youth in terms of their potential to change society
as they grow into maturity. "We decided to focus
our efforts on the younger generation because these
are the people who will be in positions of power
in industry, in the arts, in entertainment and in government
10-15 years down the line. If they understand
these policies better at this point of time, they will
be able to implement changes when they are in a position
to. We want to create new leaders with new ideas."
While English is the principal
medium through which its projects are conducted, the
Centre has been striving to reach out in other languages
as well. "It is one of the biggest hurdles we face,"
says Mr Shah. A bigger problem, at least in the beginning,
was finding the resources to support the Centre's activities.
"It's easier to get money to build a temple. I
approached quite a few people initially, even business
houses, and the response would be: 'Oh, you want to
do research and seminars? Why should we fund it? That's
the government's job.'" Mindsets and outlooks are
changing, but the Centre's efforts, unlike programmes
in, say, health or education, are impossible to quantify
through results.
The Sir Ratan Tata Trust has
been one of the Centre's most significant backers. In
1999 and 2000 the Trust sanctioned two consecutive annual
grants totalling Rs 5.4 lakh. In March 2003 the Trust
went many steps further, bestowing just over Rs 1 crore
for CCS to expand its programmes over a three-year period.
"This is a professional organisation with a focused
vision," says Arun Pandhi, a programme officer
with the Trust. "Their thinking is unusual, since
they tend to concentrate more on individuals and, through
them, on sparking change in institutions." Mr Shah
is comfortable with the unusual tag; he does not even
like the 'non-governmental organisation' moniker. "Why
should you define yourself in opposition to something
else?" he asks. "Secondly, this sort of branding
gives too much importance to government. I prefer the
term private voluntary organisations."
Nobel laureate and free-market
guru Milton Friedman is one of the Centre's many admirers.
"CCS is serving a vital role in facilitating India's
movement from a centralised economy to a free, private-enterprise
economy
" he states in a ringing endorsement.
"Its imaginative projects are guiding and affecting
policy." High praise for an organisation and an
idea whose time, at least in this country, has been
late in arriving.
Uploaded in March 2005
|