|
Hidden behind
the bright colours and bold strokes of the modern Indian
art movement is the sustained patronage of the Tata
Group. Art curator Priya Maholay-Jaradi chronicles a
little-known facet of Tata benefaction that stretches
beyond business
Emperor Akbar, one of the greatest patrons of art and
culture in the history of medieval India, built his
cultural capital at Fatehpur Sikri, near Agra. Here,
he commissioned artists to paint miniature works. Akbar's
taswirkhana (atelier) was attached to his library
and, hence, texts were illustrated. Besides, Akbar's
own hobbies, acts of patronage and conquests were recorded
pictorially. The royal treasury dictated the scale of
artistic activity. Artists were provided with art material
and a studio to work in, and some of them came to be
closely attached to the inner circles of the royal court.
These artists were promoted in many of the emperor's
chronicles. Thus, the patronage of art was a multifarious
activity involving recognition of talent, commissioning
of works, payments to artists, and the promotion of
artworks and their creators. Akbar would have never
been as fondly remembered but for his artistic pursuits.
In post-independent India, when emperors had long ceased
to plan conquests and build empires, men of commerce
and industry, along with the rest of the nation, were
striving to build a new India that would be self-reliant
and prosperous. The House of Tata actively participated
in this collective national aspiration. The making of
a new Indian art was part of the grand project that
was nation-building. In 1948, the Progressive Artists'
Group, popularly known as PAG, came into being. PAG
pursued a fresh and reformist vision of art independent
of past traditions. In the absence of any monarchy,
the contours of support stood changed. There was no
single patron to perform the multifarious and multihued
function of 'patronage'.
Individuals and groups delegated work for themselves
and thus began the modern Indian art movement. New ideas,
art practices, spaces for display, exchanges, promotions
and, above all, the facilitation of buying and selling
were required for the progress of this movement. The
Tata Group, through its many representatives, became
self-delegated 'facilitators' in the new order of Indian
art. The majestic collection of visual arts hanging
at Bombay House and other Tata properties reflects the
group's wholehearted participation in the burgeoning
movement. Better known for its pivotal role in building
India's economy, the Tata Group has silently contributed
to the growth and development of the artistic environment
in modern India.
Today it is popular among corporate groups to commission
or purchase works of art. But way back in the 1940s
the Tatas were already aware of existing artists, art
movements and trends. And they always encouraged artists
of merit. A good example is the story of Walter Langhammer,
an Austrian artist from Vienna who sought refuge in
India to escape Nazism. Langhammer, who painted portraits
and landscapes, became popular with young Indian artists
of the time and, in more ways than one, spearheaded
PAG, which consisted of names such as M. F. Husain,
S. H. Raza, F. N. Souza and Ara.
Langhammer was commissioned by the Tatas to do a series
of art works on the Jamshedpur steel plant in the late
1940s. This was definitely among the pioneering series
of industrial artworks commissioned in any era. Langhammer
sojourned in Jamshedpur for about three months to complete
these works. Illustrative in nature, they reflect a
high order of execution. The impressionistic style of
painting, which leans on bold strokes while eschewing
fine details, also lends to this series an aura of nostalgia.
The deep, warm colours of the canvases exhale the smell
of the sweat of labour, the burning of coal, the heat
of the furnaces and the sound of machinery. Without
being a dry document of industry, the works stir the
viewer with their sensitive portrayal of a magnificently
successful industry in a fledgling democracy and economy.
Langhammer's series was outstanding for its artistic,
documentary and historic character.
Although PAG was formally established in 1948, artists
from the early 1940s had begun to anticipate this new
movement through their dynamic art practices. New genres
of art, such as murals, were being vociferously advocated.
It was during this period that Naval Tata played a pivotal
role in recognising murals and helping with their sales.
Some Italian prisoners of war captured by the British
were brought to India around 1946. It was put to the
then viceroy, Lord Louis Mountbatten, that the skills
of these men be used to sustain them economically. A
unit called 'Murart' was set up in the suburb of Andheri
in suburban Bombay. The Italian prisoners made decorative
panels and it was decided to show these works to elite
members of the Bombay social circle. It was here that
Naval Tata stepped in, offering to host a party at his
bungalow in Juhu. The Tata name became a determining
factor in the sales of the works that night, and 10-12
of them were sold for a handsome price of Rs 500 each.
Although the Italian artists fell outside of the paradigm
of 'modern Indian art', there was recognition of a new
school of creativity, as there was of the link created
by Naval Tata between artists and art patrons.
J. R. D. Tata's policy remained that of quiet and effective
representation. He did not believe in being seen everywhere,
which is why the Tata Group's silent presence in the
art world was felt through Jamshed Bhabha and his brother,
Dr Homi Bhabha, the atomic physicist and an artist of
merit. Dr Bhabha selected the best works from the 1950s
that was produced by the progressives. He built up the
superbly defined collection of the Tata Institute of
Fundamental Research. Similarly, the best works of the
1960s went into the suites of the Taj Hotel (JRD's sister,
Rodabeh, became a key buyer during this period).
Besides developing a good eye for art, display and
maintenance was always a concern for those handed the
responsibility of nurturing the Tata art collection.
The Tatas certainly encouraged PAG members, but that
did not mean they ignored those not attached to the
group. Naval Tata, when he was with the International
Labour Organisation, took along with him a brilliant
work of the native artist Piraji Sagara. Similarly,
the 'Bombay Group' too found recognition in the enlightened
and diversified patronage of the Tatas. Works by Madhav
Satwalekar, Shiavax Chavda, K. K. Hebbar and N. S. Bendre
were part of the Tata collection. Chavda's talent as
a muralist was later also used at the National Centre
of Performing Arts by Jamshed Bhabha. In patronising
Chavda, the Tatas recognised and accepted a genre that
defied the principles and practice of academic art.
Besides its corporate spaces, the Tata Group used its
hospitality industry to further the cause of Indian
art. Before the culture of art galleries began, there
were two exclusive exhibition spaces in Bombay. The
first floor of Metro Cinema was one and the other was
the Taj Hotel. Satwalekar fondly recalls his first exhibition
at the Taj Art Gallery, back in 1945, and acknowledges
the encouragement he received from Jamshed Bhabha, whose
fine eye helped him acquire over 500 works of modern
Indian art for the Tata Group. This Jamshed did with
a fine blend of business acumen, managing to purchase
works at prices lower than those in the market.
What set Jamshed apart as a collector was his involvement
in other art-related activities. These days a number
of industrial houses publish calendars with modern art
as its theme. This is but a resurgent practice. The
Tata Group pioneered this trend in the 1950s, with Jamshed
at the forefront. It was he who was instrumental in
publishing a Tata calendar each year, with 12 reproductions
of modern Indian artworks. These handsome wall calendars
lent enormous visibility to modern Indian art and they
became an important avenue to educate people about new
artists and artworks. Beautiful diaries with art reproductions
also came to be printed. Jehangir Sabavala's works were
among the very early ones to be reproduced in the Tata
calendars and diaries. Says Sabavala, "Many reproductions
were fondly appreciated and then Jamshed Bhabha acquired
the original paintings from various art exhibitions."
From purchasing and lending visibility to artworks,
the Tata patronage diversified into publishing. In 1946
the group started a non-profit organisation called Marg,
which means 'pathway' in Sanskrit, with the stated goal
of "setting high standards and breaking new ground
to bring about an awareness of the arts that is relevant
and applicable to India's future". Marg's founder
editor was Mulk Raj Anand, and it began as a loose encyclopaedia
of the arts of India and related civilisations. Marg
has since embraced a broad cultural and historical view
of the arts, publishing more than 200 magazines and
90 books on subjects ranging from well-planned worker
housing to the art of Burma. The House of Tata had added
another hue to their canvas of benefaction.
Tata Steel published a book titled Husain in 1988,
compiling the great painter's works. Also in the 1980s,
the Tatas and the US-based McGraw-Hill brought out,
based on Jamshed Bhabha's recommendation, The Reasoning
Vision: Jehangir Sabavala's Painterly Universe by
Dilip Chitre. "The Tatas were the first big corporation
to encourage the arts and, especially, to support struggling
artists," affirms a grateful Sabavala.
The Tatas have played the role of patron of the arts
with much grace and responsibility. This industrial
concern's impressive contribution to the building of
the nation's economy has been applauded. But its role
as avid supporters of the modern Indian art movement
is only just being discovered. Walter Langhammer became
an artist-in-residence at Jamshedpur to document the
steel plants; today Tata Steel conducts regular art
camps for young talent in that city. Akbar's legacy
of patronage may be long dead, but the new corporate
culture of patronage spearheaded by the Tatas is alive
and well.
Uploaded in March
2005
|