|
Best
practices in corporate governance can only emerge when
informed by an established set of business principles
and a defined approach towards organisational behaviour,
says management consultant Anil Chopra*
The fall of many US corporations in the early years
of the 21st century brought one clear message to the
fore: ethics matters in business. You can fool some
people all the time, or all people some of the time,
but ultimately you cannot fool all the people all the
time. If you are not running an ethical enterprise,
it will cost you dearly at some point or the other.
Business leaders, thus, need to bring ethical conduct
to the core of their agenda, if they have not already
done so.
But how does a company go about doing this? To share
experiences and look for answers, four business ethics
organisations joined forces in early 2004 to create
the first European conference for ethics and compliance
practitioners. The conference, called Ideas and Best
Practices in Business Ethics, was held in France and
around 100 corporate ethics practitioners from nine
countries attended it. The meeting provided them an
opportunity to meet their counterparts, share ideas
and best practices, and create a forum for continuous
dialogue among ethics and compliance professionals in
organisations. The participants came from a range of
industries, including information technology, telecommunications,
oil and gas, defence, banking and finance, utilities,
automotive, retail and healthcare. The overwhelming
majority of the delegates gave the event a high rating
and voted in favour of having another conference this
year.
The main takeaway from the conference is simple: the
sooner companies begin discussing and enacting processes
for managing integrity standards within their organisations,
the better. In India senior business leaders have to
start giving more thought to this area of organisational
behaviour, start framing their beliefs on integrity
standards, circulate these among their employees and
get their conference and affirmation on adherence to
these standards.
More important, senior leaders must create communication
platforms that encourage employees (and other associates
of the company) to raise concerns related to possible
or actual deviations from integrity standards — especially
those that could damage the reputation of the organisation.
All such platforms and processes must get institutionalised
in due course.
Kenneth E. Goodpaster, professor of business ethics
at the University of St. Thomas, Minneapolis, USA, emphasises
that "business leaders are the principal architects
of corporate conscience. They are the ones who must
manage the challenges associated with pursuing profit
while maintaining integrity. They are the ones most
responsible for delivering on the moral agenda of the
corporation. That agenda includes three broad imperatives:
orienting, institutionalising and sustaining ethical
values within the corporate culture."
Given the high competitive pressures, it is easy for
business leaders to say that enforcing ethical conduct
is difficult, but this is not an excuse they can use.
As Jeffrey E. Garten, dean of the Yale School of Management,
wrote in his book, The Politics of Fortune: A New Agenda
for Business Leaders, "The essential point should not
be lost: the more complex the markets become, the more
the integrity of its leaders matters, and the less likely
that higher prescriptive laws and regulations will really
matter."
Thomas W. Dunfee of the Wharton School, who holds the
Kolodny Chair of Social Responsibility in Business,
even has a tool — the C2 Principles for Combating Corruption
— that business leaders can use as a starting point
for framing their own ethical standards.
Among the first issues that need discussing in organisations
that want to be seen as ethical are the following:
- Creating the post of ethics practitioner or counsellor,
with a specific description of the job and its responsibilities.
- Discussion of ways and means of embedding values
in an organisation.
- Route map for implementing a code of conduct and
establishing a clearly stated set of integrity standards.
- Working out the relationship between ethics and
other business functions, and aligning company policies
with the code.
- Planning for ethics training and communication to
employees.
- Creating a structure for ethics monitoring, compliance
auditing and whistle blowing.
Best practices in corporate governance can emerge when
informed by an established set of business principles
and a defined approach towards organisational behaviour.
Without such business ethics, governance stands bereft
of a well-reasoned rationale. Left to itself, corporate
governance runs the real risk of becoming a mere form-filling
exercise, dedicated to observing form. The roadmap,
thus, needs to be based on substance, which means adhering
to a dedicated code of behavioural norms in its spirit.
My past employers, the Tatas, have used the maxim 'leadership
with trust' to promote ethical conduct throughout the
group, and this is borne out by its longevity. The group's
embedded values have been unity, integrity, excellence,
responsibility and understanding. Since 1999, the group
has circulated to all its employees a document called
the 'Tata code of conduct', which is simple, easy to
understand and easy to follow. In its journey towards
institutionalisation, the substance of the code is constantly
communicated at all levels of the organisation, apart
from parties with whom the Tatas do business.
The content of the code covers such areas as commitment
towards national interest, maintaining harmonious relations
with employees, abhorrence of bribery and corruption,
avoidance of conflicts of interest, and emphasis on
corporate social responsibility. The Tata code enhances
internal and external trust and confidence.
The key pitfall to avoid while drawing up such codes is
that the contents should not give employees a feeling
that these are a set of dos and don'ts, or that they are
too complex. In fact, whenever employees are faced with
ethical dilemmas, the code should offer clear integrity
standards to follow. The organisation (through its senior
leadership) should communicate often that it has formally
adopted a specific position or set of beliefs regarding
these fundamental values or principles and that it expects
(and wants) employees to use them as the basis for business
decision-making.
A code's credibility depends largely on setting up
an effective compliance programme, the key elements
of which should include:
- Clear, established standards, policies and procedures
that are reasonably capable of reducing the likelihood
of violations of the code.
- Assigned supervision to high-level personnel. Each
CEO should be the principal ethics officer, with the
process being delegated, top down, to credible individuals
in each company.
- A clearly designated ethics counsellor / officer.
At Tatas the role of the ethics counsellor is well
defined.
- Encouragement to whistleblowers to report violations,
or possible violations, to the ethics counsellor.
- Communication and training to all employees. This
is the ultimate guarantee of the success of the ethics
code.
- Establishment of an advisory channel so that employees
can obtain advice regarding possible ethics dilemmas.
- Establishment of uniform disciplinary actions in
case of violations and taking preventive steps to
head off future violations, after understanding the
'root' causes of such violations; for example, by
forming appropriate organisational policies.
At company management conferences, the CEO, as the principal ethics officer, could facilitate occasional 'breakout sessions' to discuss subjects like payment of facilitation and speed money, handling letters received in anonymity, board oversight of the process for driving ethical behaviour and so on.
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act stipulates that any company
whose securities are registered or traded in the US
has to adopt a code of ethics. Calpers (the California
Public Employees' Retirement System), one of largest
US pension funds, is a prominent crusader for reform
in corporate governance and its fund managers may well
adopt reality tests on whether processes for managing
business ethics are in place to safeguard the interests
of its shareholders, that is, US pensioners.
While economists and managers know how to measure efficiency, we also need to define and find acceptable measures of fairness. Tools have been developed to capture the perceptions of employees in organisations that have developed robust ethical standards per se. Moving forward, companies need to collaborate to weed out corrupt practices. At the macro level, though, effective corporate governance would largely depend on reforms related to robust corporate law, accounting standards, strong regulations, an efficient judicial system, and determined efforts to establish integrity standards within companies by clamping down on corruption and preventing violations.
.
In India, the Department of Company Affairs, the Securities and Exchange Board and organisations such as the Central Vigilance Commission need to start a dialogue with international bodies like the Ethics Officers Association, the Conference Board, USA, and Transparency International, Berlin, among others. This will help put in place appropriate processes for managing ethics, implementing codes of integrity standards and business principles for countering bribes, dissuading corrupt practices and the like.
*Anil Chopra is a management consultant
and was till recently a senior consultant on the management
of business ethics at Tata Quality Management Services.
This article has been taken from the February 2005 issue
of Indian Management, a publication from the Business
Standard group.
More Speakers' Forum articles:
|
|
Mantras
for emerging markets:
Alan Rosling, executive director of Tata
Sons, explains the reasoning behind his belief that
China and India will emerge as major global economies
in the coming 20 years |
|
|
The
quest for ‘sustainable’ business:Sustainable
development cannot be achieved by a single enterprise
— or by the entire business community — in isolation,
argues Syamal Gupta, the chairman of Tata International.
It is a pervasive philosophy to which every stakeholder
in society and participant in the global economy
must willingly subscribe |
|
|
The
people principle: Dr Wayne Brockbank, professor
of business at the University of Michigan Business
School, explains the ‘why, what and how’ of human
resource strategy, and where companies can make
the greatest gains. |
Uploaded on March 9, 2005

|