|
Tata Chemicals
is stepping up gear. Last year it set up an Innovation
Centre in Pune headed by chief scientist, Dr Murali
Sastry. A physicist by training, he was with the
International Centre for Theoretical Physics in Trieste,
after acquiring his doctorate from IIT Madras. On his
return to India in 1991, he joined the National Chemical
Laboratory in Pune. He moved to Tata Chemicals in 2005.
Setting up the Innovation Centre has been an exciting
challenge, and Dr Sastry is confident it will be an
important driver in the transformation of the company.
He talks to Sujata Agrawal, about his ideas and
vision for the centre.
On the need for the Innovation
Centre
Tata Chemicals is a commodity chemicals company and
its products (soda ash, soda bicarb, fertilisers) are
highly capital intensive and have a relatively low return
on investment. Worldwide, however, chemicals businesses
are evolving through hi-tech inputs, with Dow Chemicals,
DuPont, etc, getting into areas that are more knowledge-centric;
including specialty chemicals, fine chemicals, biometric
approaches to making materials, and even advanced materials
with a green chemistry orientation. These are R&D-centric
businesses, where you need to generate your own knowledge
and intellectual property.
 |
The centre was conceptualised
about two years ago and we have an interim lab in Pune
with 18 scientists currently a good mix of nanotechnologists,
bio-technologists and chemical engineers. We are recruiting
an IPR expert for filing patents and in the process
of putting together a small business development team.
A state-of-the-art lab, for both biotech as well as
nanotech work, is planned to be set up in Hyderabad.
The Innovation Centre will play
a dual role; greening our existing businesses by looking
at biochemical processes that are more environment friendly
or more energy efficient to make the same product, as
well as developing new products. Its primary focus is
identifying new business opportunities for Tata Chemicals,
in line with the company's strategy.
On collaborating with the
academia
We have many collaborations with academic institutions,
both in India and overseas. If we hear about interesting
work being done in a research institution or learn about
an exciting new technology that would be useful for
us, we would seek some form of collaboration or research
partnership. Some projects are done completely by our
partners, but in most cases one of our scientists actually
works with the team; he learns on the job and becomes
an inventor.
On new technologies developed
It's too early for us to have developed our own new
technology but we are very close to filing a patent
in three of our partnership projects. Even if Tata Chemicals
chooses not to manufacture the product, the intellectual
property would be valuable and can be exploited.
On nanotechnology
I am very passionate about talking to students. I often
visit schools and colleges, and talk to students about
nanotechnology. People hear nanotechnology can be bad,
and I think there is a need to give people an honest
account of the benefits this technology can provide.
While the urban public is aware
of nanotechnology, mainly through the media, there's
a big disconnect in rural areas. Indian scientists often
don't talk to the public and explain new technologies.
Public outreach, as it's known abroad, needs to be done
seriously in India and this will be another important
area for the centre.
On new opportunities for scientists
It is boom time in India for academia wanting to get
into industry, as many research labs are opening; but
very few senior scientists are willing to take the plunge.
It's a risky proposition, especially if you have established
yourself in academia. Industry does not always care
about publications or awards; it's concerned with getting
processes operating or putting products into the market.
It is the younger generation
of Indian scientists who want to return to India, who
are seriously looking at industry as an option. They
see it as a challenge; something that was not available
to them earlier. Some of them are interested in joining
the Innovation Centre because of the Tata name, which
is a big draw. Once they join, the challenge will be
to ensure that we provide them with the necessary infrastructure
and facilities. We have to create the right work culture
to be able to retain the best, as they always have a
choice of moving to a competing R&D lab.
On motivating scientists
There are basically two groups of scientists. The thinkers
are driven by doing basic science learning more
and understanding better they don't worry about
whether their work helps in developing products that
can be marketed. Thinkers must be given space to experiment
and freedom to do new things. The doers are interested
in actually developing products or creating processes.
They are not interested in understanding why a nano-material
has a particular property; rather, they want to know
if it can be used to develop a product or in a process.
The challenge for me is to get an appropriate mix of
thinkers and doers for the centre.
Both groups require good growth
opportunities and recognition of their contributions.
This need not be in terms of monetary benefits; for
scientists, recognition of their ideas is more important
than money. Apart from this, creating the right work
environment is my challenge creating growth opportunities,
the freedom to work on their ideas, and a compensation
package on par or better than what the industry averages.
On his vision for the future
I have a grand vision, to make this a state-of-the-art
Innovation Centre and one of the top R&D labs in
India, focused on nanotechnology and bio-technology;
a lab that will not only create new businesses but also
generate tremendous knowledge. People believe that a
corporate innovation centre only looks at making products,
but a lot of knowledge generation actually goes hand
in hand. In my ideal Innovation Centre, doing basic
research would be as important as applied work. The
question is only one of finding the right mix of both.
On working with other Tata
companies
Nanotechnology is not a standalone technology. It's
actually an enabling technology that cuts across so
many of the areas that the Tata Group is working in.
In Tata
Motors, it could revolutionise fuel, lubricants,
or even engine parts. In Tata Steel, it could create
different types of composites, or coatings for steel
We have expertise in nanotechnology
which can be shared with other Tata companies for mutual
benefit. Many people in the Group want to know more
about what nanotechnology can do for their businesses
and several have asked me to come and speak to them.
On the innovation mission
trip
We visited some very innovative companies in the US
recently. It was a fantastic
experience and extremely useful from the Innovation
Centre's point of view, because we could see mature
processes. The deliverables for an academic group are
very different from a corporate group. Hearing how 3M,
HP or Intel functions in terms of managing and fostering
innovation was extremely useful because processes, whether
we like it or not, are required.
The mission was also useful
from the HR angle; how do these companies treat their
scientists, how are they compensated, how are they allowed
to grow? HR is a critical component in such companies
and we need to take it seriously. They have a two-pronged
career growth plan, and it is something we would like
to implement in the Innovation Centre. It means that
people who are really good at R&D should be allowed
to grow in that direction and not have to worry about
trying to become a manager to get those top-level promotions.
Uploaded on March 14, 2007

|