|
The competition is stiff and,
besides, there’s a behemoth to contend with. George
Oommen, the managing director of Tata AIG Life Insurance
Company Limited, realises what he is up against and is,
consequently, tailoring his strategy to suit the circumstances.
Mr Oommen brings plenty of experience
and expertise to the task at hand. An alumnus of the
London School of Accountancy, he joined American International
Assurance (AIA) in Kuala Lumpur in 1981. In 1990 Mr
Oommen was appointed vice president and comptroller
of AIA and in 1999 he was designated as vice president.
In 2000 he was deputed to Jakarta, Indonesia, as vice
president-director of the AIG Lippo Life joint venture.
In this interview with Alok
Agarwal, Mr Oommen talks about the company he heads,
the challenges it faces and its plans to come good in
the potentially lucrative Indian life insurance sector.
tata.com: There
is an impression that AIG's presence in the non-life
insurance sector is more pronounced the world over than
in life insurance.
George Oommen: AIG has been a composite insurance
company all along. The only thing that has changed over
the years is the structure of its business. In 1981
life insurance comprised about 30 per cent of AIG's
operations and non-life 70 per cent. Today 50 to 55
per cent comes from life and only 40 per cent from non-life
(the rest is derived from financial services). AIG's
life insurance division has been growing at an average
of about 15 per cent.
As far as Tata AIG is concerned, we set up base in December
2000 and began commercial operations in April 2001.
India is the last frontier in the world for AIG before
it begins to sell in outer space! When we were looking
for a partner in India, the Tata name cropped up before
anyone else's. Tata is a big name in India and it has
a fantastic brand name. Of the total equity investment
of Rs 125 crore, 74 per cent has come from the Tatas.
tata.com: Which are the cities in India
where you have branches?
GO: We are already operating from Mumbai, Delhi,
Chennai, Kolkata, Hyderabad, Bangalore, Pune and Chandigarh.
We will have branches in Ahmedabad, Kochi and Jamshedpur
in the next phase and we will add a maximum of five
cities every year to our list.
tata.com: Give
us some idea about the potential of the life insurance
business in India
GO: A life insurance
policy covers one's personal self. Unlike with general
insurance, it is not like insuring a vehicle. Having said
that, if we consider that India's population is one billion
and growing, we get a picture of the true potential of
the life insurance sector in India. LIC has been in business
for 50 years now and has not covered the entire population
base yet. About 250 to 300 million Indians are still insurable.
LIC has issued about 70 to 80 million policies till now,
with new premium income of US$ 1 billion. Its assets have
been estimated at $37 billion and in the last quarter
it reported a 60 per cent growth in new business. LIC's
business is growing at the rate of 20 per cent every year.
That is the kind of potential one is talking about in
life insurance in India.
Tax benefits have been driving
LIC's business over the years and the same will drive
ours, too, since the same incentives are available to
all insurance companies. I believe there is a large
potential in rural India. As stipulated by the Insurance
Regulatory Development Authority [IRDA], five per cent
of our new business must cover rural India and the figure
must reach 15 per cent by the fifth year. All of this
is very encouraging for the life insurance sector.
tata.com: How does Tata AIG propose to compete
with LIC, given the latter’s strong selling and distribution
network?
GO: There is no question of competing with LIC.
It already has about 8 lakh agents and that number is
likely to go up to 10 lakh by the end of the current
fiscal. No company is allowed to poach on another's
agents, least of all on LIC's. We only select freshers
and, five years down the line, we hope to have about
1 lakh agents. Right now we have about 5,000 agents,
either undergoing training or already on the streets.
Unlike the non-life segment, selling life insurance
requires a more personal touch, which is why good agents
are important in this business. In life insurance, policies
are ‘sold’ not ‘bought’. As of now about 60 per cent
of our agents work on a part-time basis, but the ratio
will come down to 50 per cent by the end of our fifth
year [in operation]. All our agents’ earnings are commission-based.
They make a 40 per cent commission in the first year
on new business and 7.5 per cent in the next two years
on renewable business. The commission rate declines
to 5 per cent in the fourth year.
We are careful about selecting
and training our agents; we want them to remain committed.
Our training involves a minimum of 100 hours of classroom
study and then there are various levels of training
beyond 100 hours. We follow a very structured system.
It's a challenge for us to make them realise that they
are building a career. All said and done, we do feel
there are limitations on the agents' side in our business.
However, we are banking on the Tata name, which, I am
sure, is working and will continue to do so in the future.
Please do not forget there is enough business for everybody.
Even if I get 1 to 2 per cent of the 250 to 300 million
insurable Indians, I would have covered a lot of ground.
tata.com:
What’s the
quantity of business you have already generated and
what is your target for the current year? What are
your management expenses and when do you hope to break
even?
GO: We hope to sell about 50,000 policies
by the end of March 2002. So far we have sold about
8,000 policies and approximately 4,000 are under submission
(about 50 per cent of our business is generated in
the last quarter of the fiscal). We have yet to venture
into the rural areas, though. At present we are not
insuring people above 60 and under 18. We do have
products that cover these age groups in the world
market, but we will at a later stage design something
that’s suitable for the Indian market.
At the current
pace of growth, we hope to break even between the
fifth and seventh year. However, if we decide to get
very aggressive about our expansion, which would mean
opening more branches, incurring more overheads and
more fixed expenses, we will break even by the end
of the seventh year.
As for management
expenses, in the life insurance segment these have
to be understood differently. In the first year of
the premium income, management expenses amount to
more than 100 per cent, largely on account of start-up
costs and high acquisition costs, which include the
costs of agent commissions, medical underwriting and
processing of new business. But management expenses
go down substantially from the second year onwards.
Over a period of time, we hope to bring our management
expenses down to approximately 5 per cent of revenues
(LIC's is 20 per cent).
tata.com: There is a perception that LIC has
scored over the new private sector insurance companies.
Is this true and, if so, why?
GO: It would not be wrong to say that a lot
of the advantage of advertising by new private sector
insurance companies has by default gone to LIC. While
we have created a lot of awareness through our advertisements,
LIC has benefited. Why? Because LIC has a much wider
branch network, and buyers are surer of LIC because
it has been in existence for long; they are more comfortable
about its safety. I must add that some LIC agents
continue to follow the unethical practice of offering
discounts from their commissions to new policy buyers;
this makes a difference.
 |
tata.com: Is
Tata AIG thinking of introducing policies that are
better and more innovative than those of LIC?
GO: To come out with innovative products will
take time. We are all still new in India and are kind
of
testing the waters. New entrants are averse to taking
risks and have, therefore, taken the safe route. Moreover,
innovative products have failed in the past (the unit-linked
insurance plan, for instance; it was too complicated).
Agents will sell only those products they themselves
understand and are comfortable with.
Where we are scoring
is in terms of additional benefits. In terms of basic
product structure there is not much variation, but
in terms of add-ons there are many differences. Take,
for example, our 15-year ‘term with refund of premium’
policy, which is similar to LIC's Bima Kiran: not
only is our premium cheap, which helps the buyer go
for a higher cover, it also has an add-on in the form
of a double and triple accident indemnity rider, which
Bima Kiran does not have.
tata.com: Critics say that the new private sector
companies are riding piggyback on LIC's premium tables
and rates.
GO: The premium rates and tables used by us
are our very own. Our premium rates appear to be on
the higher side when compared with others because
our policies carry more add-on benefits. All our policies,
endowment, money back, etc, carry compound reversionary
bonus, which means the bonus is being compounded.
In the case of LIC, the bonus is simple. We give terminal
bonus on death. Then there is a guaranteed addition
of 10 per cent of the sum assured after 10 years.
We have been able
to sell even though our premium rates are higher by
30 to 40 per cent because of the value we add. The market
understands this value addition very well. Premium rates
are not dependent merely on mortality rates; they also
depend on morbidity, inflation, solvency rates, taxes,
investment rates, expenses and more.
We want to
invest more in technology. Our future plans include
speeding up our response time. We will equip each of
our offices with underwriters and claim processors,
besides offering personalised service to policy owners.

|