Tata Group
 
 
Knowledge centre links
print this page
  other articles
 
Get your strategy working

Vikas Sinha and Rajesh Kamat*

Our new section on strategy issues facing companies in the new millennium kicks off with an examination of why good strategies fail (because of poor deployment), and how the right framework can correct the situation

"Strategies are intellectually simple; their execution is not," said Lawrence Bossidy, CEO, Allied Signal, illustrating the significance of strategy deployment. Say that to the CEOs of today and, chances are, they couldn’t agree more. ‘Why CEOs Fail’, a 1999 Fortune feature on prominent CEO failures, revealed that in a majority of the cases failure occurred not because of bad strategy, but poor deployment.

The ‘corporate strategy board’, a round table of corporate strategy heads from leading global corporations, conducted a survey in early 2002 asking business leaders to rate their key strategic challenges. The respondents overwhelmingly voted for ‘translating strategy into action’ as their top priority for the year.

Effective strategy deployment is crucial in enabling an organisation to achieve its objectives. This requires participation from all levels of the company, and a seamless alignment of individual actions with the organisation’s strategy.

It is not easy to achieve this alignment. Companies are faced with several issues that prevent effective strategy deployment. Some of them are:

  • Ambiguity in the company’s strategic objectives.
  • Overemphasis on financial targets, without relevant business-process measures.
  • Disconnection between firm level/strategic objectives and process level/individual performance metrics.
  • Ineffective performance-linked rewards and consequences.

To address these issues, companies need to use a structured framework for strategy deployment. This comprises a basket of three simple but effective tools:

  • Balanced scorecard (BSC)
  • Performance management system (PMS)
  • Annual operating plan (AOP)
The framework (click here for graphic) envisages cascading the strategic objectives and initiatives of the organisation into department- and business process-level activities, and further incorporating them into targets and metrics for individual employees.

Linking strategy to organisational measures: the BSC
The last decade has witnessed significant changes in the business environment. Opportunities for value creation have shifted from managing physical assets, like factories, warehouses and infrastructure, to managing ‘intangibles’, like customer knowledge, brands, proprietary know-how, relationships, organisational processes, information technology and databases.


In this business environment, delivering shareholder value consistently requires more than just managing revenue and cost. Today, in addition to financial measures, companies need to manage a variety of operational measures. These operational measures, such as customer satisfaction, defect rate, response time and new product introduction, while not directly influencing the organisation’s financial performance, serve as ‘lead indicators,’ enabling them to sustain profitability in the long term.

The BSC provides an effective tool to capture these financial and operational measures (click here for graphic). It specifies goals from four perspectives — customer, internal, learning and financial — and outlines the metrics for measurement and review of strategic initiatives. The BSC could be developed for the corporate as a whole and further disaggregated to the small business units and profit centres.

Linking measures to individual metrics: the PMS
Companies don’t implement strategy; people do. To achieve operational goals such as cycle time, quality, productivity and costs managers must identify measures that are controlled or influenced by employee actions. The strategic initiatives of the company need to be mapped clearly to the process owners and responsibilities defined.

The PMS provides a powerful tool to link such organisational goals, objectives and initiatives to an individual’s metrics (click here for graphic), and it has to be evolved through a highly interactive process, since it involves multiple linkages across business units and departments.

There could also be cases of conflicting objectives. For instance, a sales manager’s objective of providing outstanding customer service could conflict directly with a logistics manager’s objective of minimising pipeline inventory. The challenge in evolving the PMS is to gauge the scope and extent of such interdependencies and negotiate acceptable tradeoffs while ensuring seamless alignment.

The combination of the BSC and the PMS enables a company to cascade the organisation’s strategy and key initiatives into goals and metrics for individual employees.

Integrating targets with measures: the AOP
The AOP provides numerical targets for each of these goals and metrics. It clearly specifies measurable targets for revenue, cost, key initiatives, tactical moves and action points for the coming year. A review calendar, comprising monthly/quarterly targets and critical milestones, could be evolved from the AOP. By monitoring these milestones top management can gain a clear view of the organisation’s progress on implementing its strategic plan.

Case study: Strategy deployment at TCI Limited
To understand how the system works, consider the experience of a large chemical manufacturer, say, TCI. 

During the strategy-formulation exercise, TCI realised that to maintain the growth momentum it would need to develop the export market. However, sales and marketing continued to focus on existing domestic customers, resulting in poor export growth. The shift in strategic direction was not adequately translated into a corresponding shift in the goals and activities of individual managers.

TCI decided to revamp its strategy-deployment process (click here for graphic). The strategic objectives were redefined using the BSC and cascaded into individual activities and metrics. Simultaneously, the AOP was developed to allocate resources apart from setting quarterly targets and critical milestones for the current year. 

Using this basket of three tools, TCI evolved an annual review calendar to monitor progress against targets, both financial and operational. TCI has since successfully deployed its strategy and progressed rapidly in its chosen direction.

Enablers for compliance
For the success of the strategy-deployment process, organisations need to put two important enablers in place:

Management information system: Information systems play an invaluable role in helping executives monitor progress against targets and track departures from plans. Having a well-designed information system enables executives to analyse variances, diagnose problems, review achievement of key individual targets, and take timely corrective action, thus ensuring overall achievement of goals.

A robust appraisal and incentives process: Companies need to instil a culture of performance and entrepreneurial expertise. An objective and transparent individual-appraisal system, coupled with performance-linked rewards and consequences, is essential to reinforce the alignment of personal effort with organisational needs.

"We strategise beautifully, we implement pathetically," said an auto-parts company executive. While a well thought out, unique business strategy is essential for any organisation, its effective deployment is crucial for getting results.

The framework described above, along with the enablers, provides organisations with the right tools to effectively deploy strategy. Using them, managers can foster in their organisations a culture that stays focused on the company’s objectives, integrates all critical activities, identifies clear targets and responsibilities, and involves everybody in the effort.

* The writers are with the Tata Strategic Management Group

top of the page