 |
R. M. Lala
has written books
on a number of subjects, most notably the Tatas,
and he has met and chronicled people and institutions
whose contributions have enriched us all. Here he
talks about a literary career spanning more than
50 years and a treasure chest of memories
 |
Russi M. Lala’s affair
with words began early. In the many decades since,
he has had a meritorious literary career as editor,
publisher and writer. But essentially he is a scholar
and chronicler of greatness in people and institutions,
especially the house of Tatas.
Mr Lala started on the literary road in 1948, at
age 19, as a journalist. He worked as an executive
in a book-publishing house before, in 1959, becoming
the manager of the first Indian publishing house
in London. In 1964 he founded Himmat Weekly
along with Rajmohan Gandhi.
Mr Lala published his first book, The Creation
of Wealth: The Tata Story, to critical and commercial
acclaim in 1981. This was followed, in quick succession,
by Encounters with the Eminent, The
Heartbeat of a Trust, In Search of Leadership,
Beyond the Last Blue Mountain: A Life of J.
R. D. Tata, The Joy of Achievement: Conversations
with J. R. D. Tata and Celebration of the
Cells: Letters From A Cancer Survivor. He has
also, with S. A. Sabavala, co-edited Keynote,
a compilation of J. R. D Tata’s speeches. Mr Lala
has been a director of the Sir Dorabji Tata Trust
since 1985. He is the co-founder of the Centre for
Advancement of Philanthropy and has been, since
1993, its chairman.
Early this year Mr Lala released his latest book,
A Touch of Greatness: Encounters with the Eminent,
in which he has written about men and women whose
lives “demonstrate values that one can live for
and live by”. The book profiles leaders who have
made significant contributions to public life, among
them the Dalai Lama, Jayaprakash Narayan, J. B.
Kripalani, J. R. D. Tata, Mother Teresa, M. S. Subbulakshmi,
Azim Premji and Vinoba Bhave.
In this interview with Sujata Agrawal, Mr
Lala talks about his books and his recollections
of the numerous public figures that he has met over
the years.
How did you select the people who feature in
A Touch of Greatness?
The people were selected more by accident than design;
they somehow came into my orbit. There were some,
of course, that I went out of my way to meet, for
instance, Mother Teresa. Azim Premji came to see
me a couple of years ago, in connection with the
foundation that he later started. N. R. Narayanamurthy
was interested in my book on the life of
J. R. D. Tata and wanted some excerpts on excellence
from JRD. Once, when I was visiting Bangalore, he
came to meet me. He was not so well known then and
very kindly gave me a lift (he was driving his own
car) to the Bangalore Club. He then made sure I
was comfortably settled in my room.
What strikes me about [Mr Premji and Mr Narayanamurthy]
is that they have given a new face to Indian business.
Unfortunately, some industrialists had set a precedent
of ostentation, about money being the main aim and
the end justifying the means. These sort of values,
which were respected till then, were demolished
by the rise of a new breed of industrialists who
were equally, if not more, successful. They demonstrated
humility and tenaciously held onto their principles.
This is what I’ve brought out in my book. They are
very different from each other: Narayanamurthy is
effusive, warm-hearted and an extrovert; Azim is
more of an introvert. He doesn’t talk much but is
a great thinker. I think we are very lucky to have
two such people in our business world. Both are
inspired by Jamsetji Tata and JRD.
You had earlier written Encounters with the
Eminent. Is A Touch of Greatness a revised
version of it?
I wrote this book because I wanted to inspire people,
specially the younger generation. In Encounters
with the Eminent I wrote about men and women who
had influenced generations of Indians. I met political
personalities like [C. Rajagopalachari] and [Jayaprakash
Narayan] when I was the editor of Himmat Weekly.
I met former Indian president Zakir Hussain through
my own personal contacts. I knew JRD and Nani Palkhivala
because by then, I had come into the orbit of the
Tatas.
Some of these profiles in Encounters have
been updated, but I rewrote the pages on JRD because
I had not known him well at the time of doing the
first interview. I later came to know him closely
over a period spanning 15 years. I consider it one
of the greatest privileges of my life.
Twenty years after Encounters was published
(and out of print), I started A Touch of Greatness,
a revised and greatly enlarged version of Encounters.
I asked myself what had I learned from these people
that I would like to pass on to the reader. Two
people came to mind: Vinoba Bhave and Mother Teresa.
I thought of Vinoba sitting on his wooden cot writing
answers on a slate in Hindi because he was keeping
silent for the day, and I recalled his words: “Purity
comes from God.”
I also thought of Mother Teresa and how, when she
talked to people, she would look them straight in
the eye. That is a mark I have seen in some great
people. They are intensely involved with the people
they are talking to. Towards the end, she said something
I remember even today: “If you judge people, you
have no time to love”. I felt she had, at one shot,
overturned the way I thought. When I am critical
of people, this thought comes to my mind, if not
instantly then in a few minutes. That, I think,
is the greatness of these people. As I was leaving,
she told me: “Write something beautiful for God.”
I have observed Dr M. S. Swaminathan closely over
the last few years and have interacted with him
often. I am associated with his foundation in Madras
and he is on the board of the
Sir Dorabji Tata Trust. He is concerned not
only about environmental protection but also about
the well-being of India. He has taken interest in
planning for the future of agriculture in this country,
in growing enough food and reaching the grain to
the poor in small ways through community and grain
banks.
I believe money is important but it should not be
the driving force of one’s life. JRD once told me
that he did not have much money, and that he had
made sure he did not. At 40 he gave some of his
best shares, including Tata Sons, to his own trust.
Nani Palkhivala, in the last few years, has donated
generously to charity. I told him that not many
people would do such a thing and he quoted an English
writer: “If you give it after you die, what’s the
use? You are only giving it because you can’t take
it.”
One has a lot to learn from these people. It was
my privilege to have known them and I want to pass
that to other people. It would be selfish of me
not to.
 |
Which is your favourite anecdote in A Touch of Greatness?
There is an interesting incident about the Dalai Lama that I have related
in the book. I had the privilege of meeting him at a conference in Panchgani.
The first night he came, there were a hundred policemen in tents outside his
house and a police inspector posted just outside his little cottage. It was
winter and very cold. Early in the morning, at about 4.30 am, the Dalai Lama
came out of his room, possibly for some fresh air, and found the inspector
sleeping in his chair. He went back in, prepared his cup of tea and an extra
cup. He brought that steaming cup of tea to the inspector and gently woke
him up. The inspector probably thought he was dreaming when he opened his
eyes and saw the Dalai Lama standing with a cup of tea in his hand! The Dalai
Lama later related this story with great interest to us — a hundred policemen
around him but no protection.
I have concentrated on such anecdotes in the book, because you read people
through their behaviour and the decency they bring to small things in life.
Why did you choose to write your first book on the Tata Group?
I did not; it was at Mr Sabavala’s initiative that I wrote the book. I had
written an outline for a pamphlet on the proposal to nationalise the steel
and automobile industries and Mr Sabavala was interested in the way I treated
the subject. He asked if I would like to write on the House of Tata and about
the proposal’s ripple effect on health, education, social affairs, atomic
energy, etc. I did not know whether he wanted a book, a booklet or a series
of articles. I wrote the first three chapters and he liked what I wrote. He
showed it to Mr Jamshed Bhabha, who is very selective, and he too liked it.
The book has been revised recently, almost 10 years after being published.
Revising it was not easy because the whole business scenario has changed.
The basic history of the group is extraordinary. The emphasis is no longer
on fighting government control, as it was earlier. Today the group faces different
challenges, such as globalisation, poverty and unemployment, and has to cope
with these issues. The Tatas are still adapting themselves, and so is everybody
else. The business situation has not stabilised and, while it is in flux,
it is not the time to write a book, though one can write articles.
How long did it take you to
write the book on the Tatas?
It took me about 13 months to write the book and it was the happiest period
of my life. It is good to be known as I happen to be known now, but it is even
better to be unknown and undisturbed. I sat in a little cubicle on the fourth
floor [of Bombay House] and nobody knew me; even some of my friends didn’t know
where I was sitting. There were hardly any phone calls and no visitors.
I also wrote Heartbeat of a Trust fairly peacefully, but all my other books
have been written in the run of other things. It is not the ideal way to write
a book but it is the only way I have now. I hope that when I step down from
my office as the Trust’s executive director, I will have more time and fewer
phone calls and meetings!
Your next book was on JRD…
After I wrote on the House of Tata, I had a choice of writing on
Jamsetji [Tata] or JRD. I told
JRD about it and he told me to write on Jamsetji. However, I realised that
if I did not capture [JRD’s] life in his lifetime, it would be very difficult
to do it later.
What are you working on now?
I am writing a book on Jamsetji. In about 20 years of research, I have found
a lot of material on him. Also, there is no really readable biography on Jamsetji,
though there is a wonderful chronicle of his life by Frank Harris. It is a very
valuable book because of its facts; and it’s written in very correct English.
But he has not brought out the fullness and the personality of Jamsetji, and
it is a very heavy book to read.
There is another book, by Saklatvala and Khosla. Saklatvala was the son of Sir
Shapurji Saklatvala, who worked with Jamsetji for a few years. They were also
related, which gave him personal insights. He brings out Jamsetji’s personality
in flashes but the book does not grip you. One has to realise that Jamsetji
was much more than a man who put up mills and planned for steel, hydroelectric
power and a research foundation that would later become the Indian Institute
of Science. Not many know that he revived sericulture in South India, imported
Japanese experts, and had a Tata silk farm. Also, I have unearthed information
about other important subjects, which I will reveal in my book.
When do you plan to bring out this book?
It should certainly be ready in time for his centenary, March 3, 2003, but possibly
earlier. It will be a centenary edition and, I hope, my last book on the Tatas.
Your books are certainly the best on understanding the Tata Group.
I don’t know if they are the best but, yes, they are the most readable. That’s
what everybody tells me. I’m not a great writer but, again from what others
tell me, I am a very readable writer.
Do you have any favourite among your books?
It’s very difficult to answer that. I think that in terms of writing, the best
book I have written is the Heartbeat of a Trust. Many people, including
P. L. Deshpande, the famous Marathi playwright, have told me this.
 |
You get attached to a book while
writing it and then you move on. Celebration of the Cells, where I
have written about my encounter with cancer, is an intensely personal book.
When you write so personally you feel that a part of your being is in that
book. A Touch of Greatness, to a small extent, also has me involved
emotionally. I have written about many I was fond of, and in a way it was
my expression of appreciation to them. Writing Joy of Achievement,
I relived some of my days with JRD. I sent the first copy to Mr Ratan Tata,
who graciously replied: “You really captured the ambience of Jeh; it was like
he was with us again!”
Why did you write Celebration of the Cells?
I thought about writing the book after I met Vandana Gupta, who works at Tata
Steel. Her husband came to see me because he had heard that I too had been
a cancer patient. That same day, quite by accident, I met her doctor in Bombay
House. The following Sunday my wife and I decided to meet her because her
husband was so worried. As we were leaving, she told us that nobody had spoken
to her the way we had. Others would tell her to be brave and that she would
be all right. She was tired of hearing platitudes and did not want to meet
any visitors. I thought that if I could help one person in 40 minutes, how
many more could I help if I wrote a book.
The book was launched at the Horniman Circle gardens [in Mumbai] and it was
a wonderful evening. I spoke a bit and so did some other cancer patients.
At the end we all sang ‘We shall overcome’ in Hindi. Nani [Palkhivala], who
stood beside me when we sang, turned to me and said it was the most moving
evening of his life.
Can you share some of your thoughts on writing?
 |
What you write, I think, depends on how you live. You can give the best of
yourself to others, which is what A Touch of Greatness and A
Celebration of Cells try to do. I also believe that an author should
know when to impose himself on the book and when to keep himself out. In
Joy of Achievement I have repeatedly used the first person narrative
technique to bring out JRD’s personality intimately. But in JRD’s biography
I have not used the first person at all. If I had imposed myself, it would
have spoiled Beyond the Last Blue Mountain.
When JRD died, I read an article written by a journalist, who mentioned that
he had met JRD only once. Yet, in that article, the writer imposed his “I”
so often that you forget what JRD said; only the ‘I’ remained. It is, therefore,
imperative that the writer realise that his or her subject is important, and
give recognition and dignity to it.
I remember an incident after I finished writing Beyond the Last Blue Mountain.
JRD had not read the manuscript; he had only read the chapters on Air India,
which I insisted he read because nobody else could tell me if there was an
error. But he did read the ending and liked it very much. He put the book
down, thought for a minute and asked, “What’s your next book on?” I had just
sweated on the book and had not thought of the next one, but I said to him,
“I don’t know, sir, but anything I write will be to make man nobler and better”.
|
|