|
Ram S. Tarneja's* memories of Naval Tata
are crystal clear to this day, specially his farsighted
and innovative thinking, and his belief that corporate
houses had an obligation to society
They say time rolls by. In the
case of my friendship with Naval Tata, time seems to
have flown by. He left us back in 1989, but I can still
clearly visualise him having a lively discussion. Such
was the impact of his personality on me.
I started my first job in India
in 1963 in Calcutta. I was associated with Sahu Jain
Industries as personnel director and Shantiprasad Jain,
the chairman of our business group, was on intimate
terms with Navalbhai. That's how I came to meet him
in the mid-1960s. I was the vice-chairman of the Calcutta
Indian Chamber of Commerce's labour commission and he
was the president of the Employers' Federation of India
(EFI). I soon realised that this was a man who could
stand up and speak openly with the powers that be.
I observed the warmth of his
friendship one evening at the palatial Tata Bungalow
at Delhi. He not only poured a cup of tea for me, but
also asked how much sugar and milk I needed. This meticulous
and personal aspect was repeated many times in my long
association with Navalbhai.
I came to Mumbai in March 1970 to be a part of the top
management of Bennett Coleman, the publishers of The
Times of India. Despite the large difference in age,
we became friends. We would discuss managerial issues
and ways to tackle them. Naval introduced me to the
EFI and ensured that I took an active interest in the
organisation.
Naval was a unique personality,
farsighted and innovative in his thinking. The views
he expressed on the employment situation in India and
the need to introduce automation are as relevant today
as they were in the 1970s. Naval was critical of our
politicians approaching economic issues purely from
a political angle.
He believed that the corporate
world had to make the fulfilling of its social responsibility
an intrinsic part of business policy. In this connection,
his foresight was extraordinary, as evidenced by the
following excerpt from an address he made at the annual
general body meeting of the EFI way back in 1972:
"In the broader context
of the future of the capitalist system, let us look
at some of the global developments that have taken place
in industrially advanced countries over the last few
years. Although the capitalist system has thus far survived
the onslaught of Marxism, the business world faces a
new challenge today from the so-called New Left, which
symbolises the voice of youth. A large proportion of
young people in Europe and America are questioning the
age-old belief in corporate giants and their multinational
ramifications. They scoff at the very character of the
free-enterprise system. They look down on the system
of mass production, industrial efficiency and automation
as a kind of grind to perpetuate drudgery.
"As a result of this attitude,
there are visible changes in the approach of US and
European corporate leaders. They have begun to believe
that they are obliged to tackle a broad range of social
problems, even though such action may temporarily retard
profits. This new mood reflects genuine altruism, and
is a reaction to the mounting attacks on big business.
More and more businessmen are becoming aware that fulfilment
of social goals is not generosity but an obligation.
They realise that they have to change, or change will
be forced on them."
Naval was instrumental in introducing
me to the International Labour Organisation [ILO] of
which he was a member for long. He invited me to meet
the ILO's director general and a couple of deputy director
generals. I served on the ILO's governing body for three
years, from 1990 to 1993, as a substitute member representing
Indian employers. This, of course, happened after Naval
had passed away. It was also through Naval that I was
invited to join the board of Tata Power in the mid-1980s.
That was the beginning of my association with Bombay
House.
My friendship with Naval grew
stronger with every passing year. One evening, Naval
and Simone Tata were having dinner with their sons,
Ratan, Jimmy and Noel, at the Taj Mahal Hotel. I was
at another table with my wife and my daughters. Naval
walked up to our table and shook hands with all of us
and greeted us with a large smile. I walked back with
Naval to their table and told him that Ratan, who had
studied with me at Cornell University in the US, would
one day succeed JRD Tata.
Naval looked at me with amusement
and amazement and said, "Ram, what makes you say
that?" My response was this: "Naval, I am
placing a bet that when this happens you will remember
my saying so and entertain me suitably and sufficiently."
Sure enough, Naval invited me to his palatial house
after what I had said came to be, when Ratan Tata was
appointed as Chairman of Tata Industries Ltd.
Today, I can say with a great
degree of satisfaction that Ratan has justified the
confidence bestowed upon him by the senior Tatas. Indians
no longer drive only a British Oxford car styled as
an Ambassador in India. Today the British ride in an
Indica styled as a City Rover in Britain. This reflects
the contribution of Naval's eldest son Ratan in a restructured
Indian economy and entrepreneurial leadership.
Naval Tata's contribution to
Indian business and labour relations will ever be alive.
His constant quest was for a social dialogue involving
all stakeholders in the development process: employees,
employers and the government. This is his greatest legacy.
*Ram S. Tarneja retired as managing
director of Bennet, Coleman & Company, the publishers
of The Times of India, in 1991. He is currently president
of the Indian Institute of Health Management and Research,
and the chairman of Nissin ABC Logistics as well as
Jolly Board.
Uploaded on August 30, 2004

|